Revisions of clinical protocols using the Plan Do Check Act cycle improved outcomes of extremely preterm infants at 2 years (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Wiley Open Access Collection
  • PMC8360062

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Revisions of clinical protocols using the Plan Do Check Act cycle improved outcomes of extremely preterm infants at 2years (1)

Acta Paediatr. 2021 Jul; 110(7): 2100–2109.

Published online 2021 Mar 25. doi:10.1111/apa.15840

PMCID: PMC8360062

PMID: 33711173

Mamoru Saikusa,1 Masahiro Kinosh*ta,1 Kennosuke Tsuda,1,2 Tadashi Hisano,2 Junichiro Okada,1 Sachiko Iwata,1,2 Hiroshi Fujino,1 Yasuki Maeno,1 Yushiro Yamash*ta,1 and Osuke IwataRevisions of clinical protocols using the Plan Do Check Act cycle improved outcomes of extremely preterm infants at 2years (2)1,2

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Aim

Clinical quality improvement is often cumbersome due to established protocols. We aimed to investigate whether outcomes of preterm infants improve with protocol revisions using iteration cycles.

Methods

Preterm infants born <28weeks gestation between January 2006 and December 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Protocols were revised using Plan Do Check Act cycle. Death and serious adverse events at term were reviewed in six‐monthly quality improvement meetings. Adverse outcome of death or motor/sensory impairments at two years was compared before and after two major protocol changes, which were implemented in January 2008 and January 2012.

Results

Based on the appraisal for period 2006–2007, strategies for surfactant, narcotics, parenteral nutrition, respiratory gas humidity and prophylactic indomethacin and antibiotics were changed for period 2008–2011. For period 2012–2015, stabilisation of infants was accelerated via very early catheterisation. Of 162 infants (84 males, 25.5±1.5weeks gestation) within the whole cohort, 63 developed adverse outcomes, which were fewer for periods 2008–2011 (p=0.013) and 2012–2015 (p=0.035) compared with period 2006–2007 (adjusted for gestational age, Apgar scores and sex).

Conclusion

Careful bottom‐up revisions of protocols using iteration cycles, accounting for local settings, successfully improved the outcomes of preterm infants.

Keywords: extremely preterm infant, intact survival, neonatal intensive care, outcome and Plan Do Check Act cycle

Abbreviations

CI
confidence interval
NICU
neonatal intensive care unit
OR
odds ratio
PDCA
Plan Do Check Act

Key Notes

  • Filling gaps between the standard of care and existing protocols is challenging, which might be accelerated using iteration cycles.

  • Protocols for surfactant replacement, respiratory gas humidity, indomethacin, antibiotics, narcotics, parenteral nutrition and catheterisation were revised using Plan Do Check Act cycle, which improved outcomes of extremely preterm infants at 2years.

  • Plan Do Check Act cycle may help reach a consensus when optimising clinical protocols.

1. INTRODUCTION

In Japan, the survival rate of extremely preterm infants born at less than 28weeks of gestation has persistently improved from approximately 80% in 2003–2010 to 93% in 2013.1, 2 However, considerable interinstitutional differences in outcomes have also been observed,3 suggesting the need to disseminate evidence‐based therapeutic regimens. However, uniform renewal of conventional regimens often encounters difficulties in institutional settings. This is partly due to their highly heterogeneous nature in terms of patient type, therapeutic options and human resources.4, 5 These factors may influence the effectiveness of implementation, and therefore, the adoption of evidence ‐based strategies may be needed to account for local settings.

During 2006 and 2007, the survival rate of infants born at less than 28weeks of gestation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, f*ckuoka, Japan, was 58%, as opposed to the 83% in Japanese tertiary NICUs in 2005.6 To improve the outcomes of extremely preterm infants, a local working group was formed in August 2007. Therapeutic regimens were revised to account for local settings, such as patient type, antibiogram, existing treatment protocols, medical resources, therapeutic options and workforce, using the Plan Do Check Act (PDCA) cycle. This iteration cycle is one of the quality improvement tools, consisting of clinical appraisal, literature review, strategy design and clinical practice monitoring.7, 8

This study aimed to investigate whether evidence‐based treatments were properly implemented and whether the PDCA cycle improved the outcomes in extremely preterm infants.

2. PATIENTS AND METHODS

2.1. Study population

Between January 2006 and December 2015, a total of 2,690 newborn infants were admitted to our NICU, which is a tertiary, referral NICU. Of these, 174 infants were born between 22+0weeks and 27+6weeks. All infants born at greater than 22 gestational weeks were provided with full intensive care options, whereas those born at 22weeks of gestation were resuscitated upon request from their parents. The study cohort comprised of 162 extremely preterm infants, excluding 10 outborn infants and two infants with chromosomal abnormalities (Figure ​(Figure11).

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 1

Profile of the study population

2.2. Clinical strategy for quality improvement

In July 2007, a working group was formed with nine consultant neonatologists, neonatal nurse practitioners, NICU nurses and paediatric registrars to improve the outcomes in extremely preterm infants. Clinical records were reviewed every six months to inspect the relevance of therapeutic regimens during the first 28days of life, referring to recommendations published in Cochrane Reviews (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK) and UpToDate (UpToDate Inc), with extended searches through other search engines. Adverse events at a corrected age of 40weeks were reviewed to identify the incidence of death, endotracheal tube reintubation, culture‐positive or clinically diagnosed septicaemia, grade III/IV intraventricular haemorrhage, dependence on oxygen/respiratory support and grade III retinopathy of prematurity. Ductus arteriosus, necrotising enterocolitis and intestinal perforation requiring surgical intervention were also noted. The working group proposed a list of possible protocol changes based on the clinical appraisal and literature review. A set of major protocol revisions were chosen and agreed upon at six‐monthly multidisciplinary quality improvement meetings. To avoid strategy drift, protocols were changed only when attendees of the meeting regarded the revision as relevant based on sufficient accumulated data. Short term adverse events were closely monitored to run the PDCA cycle. Subsequently, major changes in the clinical protocol were made on 1st January 2008 and 1st January 2012, which divided the study period into three periods of January 2006 to December 2007, January 2008 to December 2011 and January 2012 to December 2015.

2.3. Clinical background variables

Clinical variables before, during and after birth were collected from patient records (Table1).

TABLE 1

Clinical characteristics of the study cohort

VariablesPeriod

2006–2007

(n=24)

2008–2011

(n=55)

2012–2015

(n=83)

Antenatal variables
Glucocorticoid8 (33.3)34 (61.8)64 (77.1)
Intravenous ritodrine17 (70.8)49 (89.1)68 (81.9)
Intravenous magnesium14 (58.3)31 (56.4)55 (66.3)
Caesarean delivery17 (70.8)35 (63.6)53 (63.9)
Premature rupture of membranes5 (20.8)23 (41.8)25 (30.1)
Postnatal variables
Multiple births5 (20.8)4 (7.2)14 (16.9)
Male sex9 (37.5)27 (49.1)48 (57.8)
Gestational age (week)25.6±1.725.2±1.425.8±1.5
Birth weight (g)770±256713±216800±223
Cord blood pH7.31±0.097.32±0.127.36±0.08
Apgar score (1min)4 (2 – 5)3 (1 – 5)4 (2 – 6)
Apgar score (5min)7 (6 – 7)7 (5 – 7)7 (5 – 8)
Respiratory distress syndrome22 (91.7)54 (98.2)79 (95.2)
Surfactant replacement (min)a180 (150 – 195)15 (15 – 15)15 (15 – 15)
Surfactant replacement <30min1 (4.2)53 (96.4)81 (97.6)
Catheterisation (min)100±38109±4079±33
Catheterisation <67 minb3 (12.5)5 (9.1)32 (38.6)
Narcotic <24h10 (41.7)46 (83.6)67 (80.7)
Inotropes <24h14 (58.3)36 (65.5)56 (67.5)
Gentamycin <24h0 (0.0)42 (76.4)83 (100.0)
Amino acid <24h6 (25.0)49 (89.1)83 (100.0)
Indomethacin <6h10 (41.7)39 (70.9)76 (91.6)
High humidifier setting4 (16.7)55 (100.0)83 (100.0)
Intravenous glucocorticoid11 (45.8)42 (76.4)59 (71.1)
Inhaled glucocorticoid0 (0.0)6 (10.9)15 (18.1)
Diuretics for lung disease17 (70.8)47 (85.5)66 (79.5)

Open in a separate window

Note

Values are shown as number (%), mean ±standard deviation or median (quartile range).

aTime of surfactant replacement after birth recorded in 5min increments.

bThreshold of 67min defined as the lower quartile of all values.

2.4. Data analysis

The primary outcome was assessed by death or neurological impairments, defined by Gross Motor Function Classification Score greater than II, deafness or blindness at a corrected age of two years. Death or grade III/IV intraventricular haemorrhage by a corrected age of 40weeks and death by a corrected age of 2years were also used as secondary outcomes. Association between the study periods and outcomes was assessed using logistic regression analysis, controlling for sex, gestational age and Apgar score at 5min. Univariate logistic regression analysis was also performed to estimate the crude effects of clinical backgrounds on the outcome of infants.

This retrospective analysis was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki under the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Kurume University School of Medicine. Informed consent was not required for the use of anonymised data obtained for clinical reasons.

3. RESULTS

Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or median (quartile ranges) unless otherwise described. During the study period, 162 extremely preterm infants were born, with an average gestation period of 25.5±1.5weeks and an average weight of 766±218g at birth. Subsequently, all these infants, including eight infants born at 22weeks of gestation, received standard resuscitation and survived until NICU admission. Of these, 87.7% of infants survived until discharge (Table1 and Figure ​Figure11).

3.1. Appraisal for period 2006–2007

Of the 24 infants born during this period, those with respiratory failure were intubated immediately after birth. Peripheral or peripherally inserted central catheters were inserted at 100±38min after birth (Table1). Surfactant was replaced at 180 (150–195) min after birth only after confirming the depth of the endotracheal tube using a radiograph (Table1), which was relatively later than clinically recommended.9 Intravenous indomethacin was considered only for patients with significant ductal shunt. Prophylactic ampicillin (100mg/kg/day) and cefotaxime (100mg/kg/day) were administered to infants born at less than 26weeks of gestation and those with suspicion of infection. A relatively low humidity setting was used for the ventilator circuit, with the humidifier chamber outlet temperature of 35°C and Y‐piece temperature of 37°C. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was routinely used at 5cmH2O after weaning from invasive respiratory support. We also encouraged minimum handling approach and developmental care, such as positioning of limbs, quiet environment and dim lighting.

In terms of adverse events at 40weeks postconceptional age, eight infants died of immaturity after failing to respond to the maximum cardiac/respiratory support, each on days zero, one, two, three, three, four, 13 and 21. In addition, three infants died of septicaemia due to ampicillin/cefotaxime resistant gram‐negative rods, each on days six, six and 40. Endotracheal tube reintubation was required in eight infants; tube obstruction was confirmed in four cases. None of the infants required a bowel surgery for necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation. Grade III/IV intraventricular haemorrhage and dependence on oxygen/respiratory support were observed in three and 14 infants, respectively (Table2).

TABLE 2

Outcome of the study cohort

VariablesPeriod
2006–2007 (n=24)2008–2011 (n=55)2012–2015 (n=83)
40weeks corrected age
Death11 (45.8)7 (12.7)1 (1.2)
Endotracheal tube reintubation8 (33.3)13 (23.6)13 (15.7)
Endotracheal tube blockade4 (16.7)2 (3.6)0 (0.0)
Enteral feeding 100ml/kg >day 17a12 (50.0)19 (34.5)15 (18.1)
Necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation0 (0.0)2 (3.6)3 (3.6)
Symptomatic patent ductus arteriosusb5 (20.8)10 (18.2)7 (8.4)
Surgical ductus closure5 (20.8)10 (18.2)7 (8.4)
Antibiotic for systemic infection20 (83.3)50 (90.9)55 (66.3)
Intraventricular haemorrhage III/IV3 (12.5)13 (23.6)11 (13.3)
Intraventricular haemorrhage III/IV or death11 (45.8)16 (29.1)11 (13.3)
Periventricular leukomalacia0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Chronic lung diseasec14 (58.3)49 (89.1)64 (77.1)
Grade III retinopathy of prematurity8 (33.3)36 (65.5)21 (25.3)
48weeks corrected age
Death11 (45.8)7 (12.7)1 (1.2)
Respiratory supportd1 (4.2)6 (10.9)20 (24.1)
Respiratory supportd or death12 (50.0)13 (23.6)21 (25.3)
2years corrected age
Death11 (45.8)7 (12.7)2 (2.4)
Tube feeding1 (4.2)1 (1.8)5 (6.0)
Tube feeding or death12 (50.0)8 (14.5)7 (8.4)
Respiratory supportd1 (4.2)2 (3.6)6 (7.2)
Respiratory supportd or death12 (50.0)9 (16.4)8 (9.6)
Deafness and/or blindness1 (4.2)8 (14.5)7 (8.4)
Deafness, blindness or death12 (50.0)15 (27.3)9 (10.8)
Cerebral palsy1 (4.2)10 (18.2)24 (28.9)
Cerebral palsy or death12 (50.0)17 (30.9)26 (31.3)
Epilepsy1 (4.2)5 (9.1)4 (4.8)
Epilepsy or death12 (50.0)12 (21.8)6 (7.2)
Language disability0 (0.0)11 (20.0)22 (26.5)
Language disability or death11 (45.8)18 (32.7)24 (28.9)
Cerebral palsy, deafness or blindness2 (8.3)13 (23.6)28 (33.7)
Cerebral palsy, deafness, blindness or death13 (54.2)20 (36.4)30 (36.1)

Open in a separate window

Note

Values are shown as number (%).

aThreshold of 17days defined as the upper quartile of all values.

bHaemodynamically significant ductus arteriosus requiring intravenous indomethacin (excluding prophylactic treatment) and/or surgical closure.

cDefined as need for supplemental oxygen at 36weeks of postconceptional age.

dIncluding supplemental oxygen and other invasive/non‐invasive respiratory support.

At the quality improvement meeting, the working group proposed early surfactant replacement and early catheterisation to promote early stabilisation of infants. High humidifier setting for the respiratory gases, prophylactic indomethacin, routine use of narcotics, early parenteral nutrition and prophylactic ampicillin/gentamicin was also proposed. Attendees of the meeting agreed that early stabilisation of infants and prevention of systemic infection and endotracheal tube blockage must be prioritised. Subsequently, protocols were changed to administer surfactant in less than 30min after birth and use the standard humidifier setting with humidifier chamber outlet 37°C and Y‐piece 40°C.10, 11 The use of prophylactic indomethacin of 0.1mg/kg/dose,12 ampicillin/gentamicin instead of ampicillin/cefotaxime,13, 14, 15, 16, 17 continuous intravenous fentanyl of 1µg/kg/h 18, 19 and parenteral nutrition with amino acid infusion 12, 20 within 24h of birth was also implemented.

3.2. Appraisal for period 2008–2011

For all the 55 infants born during this period, surfactant was replaced precisely at 15min after birth (Table1). Catheters were inserted at 109±40min after birth. Intravenous indomethacin was administered within 6h after birth in 70.9% of the infants. The standard high humidifier setting was used for all 55 infants during the study period. Prophylactic gentamicin was administered to 76.4% of infants. From the period 2006–2007 to 2008–2011, there was an upward trend of administering narcotics and amino acid infusion within 24h of birth (Table1). Maternal glucocorticoid exposure also tended to increase although no protocol change was made with respect to this treatment (Table1). No significant change was noted for the minimum handling approach, developmental care and use of CPAP devices.

Of the 55 infants born during the period 2008–2011, three died of immaturity without responding to the cardiac and respiratory support on days one, two and five. Deaths from septicaemia occurred in two infants on days one and five, respectively. Their blood cultures were positive for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively, both of which were resistant to ampicillin, cefotaxime and gentamicin. Deaths due to necrotising enterocolitis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were also noted in one each infant on days eight and 35, respectively. Endotracheal tube reintubation was required in 13 infants; tube obstruction was confirmed in two infants. Bowel surgery for necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation, grade III/IV intraventricular haemorrhage and dependence on oxygen/respiratory support were observed in two, 13 and 49 infants, respectively (Table2).

The working group proposed to speed‐up the administration of prophylactic indomethacin and commencement of narcotics and parenteral nutrition via very early insertion of vascular catheters. Attendees of the quality improvement meeting agreed that the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage should be reduced via an even earlier stabilisation of infants. Protocols were changed to encourage very early completion of catheterisation within 1h after birth using umbilical catheters. The catheters were used to administer indomethacin within 6h of birth, and subsequently, administration of narcotics and parental nutrition was also initiated.

3.3. Appraisal for period 2012–2015

For 83 infants born during this period, surfactant was replaced precisely at 15min after birth (Table1). The standard humidifier settings and prophylactic gentamicin were used in all infants. Catheterisation was completed at 79±33min after birth. Intravenous indomethacin was administered within 6h after birth in 91.6% of the infants. Between periods 2008–2011 and 2012–2015, there was a trend towards increased maternal glucocorticoid exposure. However, no marked changes were observed in the use of narcotics and amino acid infusion within 24h of birth and the minimum handling approach, developmental care and use of CPAP devices (Table1).

Of the 83 infants born during this period, one infant born at 23.3weeks of gestation died on day zero because of immaturity after failing to respond to the cardiac/respiratory support. Thirteen infants required endotracheal tube reintubation, none of which was confirmed as tube obstruction. Bowel surgery, grade III/IV intraventricular haemorrhage and dependence on oxygen/respiratory support were seen in three, 11 and 64 infants, respectively (Table2).

3.4. Independent variables of the primary outcome

At a corrected age of two years, 20 infants died, 35 developed cerebral palsy and 16 were diagnosed as deaf or blind (Table2). Univariate analysis revealed that death or neurological impairments were associated with gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores at 1 and 5min, the requirement for inotropes on day zero, surgical ductus closure and delayed establishment of enteral feeding (p<0.001, p=0.006, p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.001, p=0.040 and p<0.001, respectively) (Table3). Reduction in death or neurological impairments was associated with the therapeutic regimen for periods 2008–2011 and 2012–2015 even after adjusting for gestational age, Apgar scores at 5min and sex (vs. period 2006–2007; p=0.013 and 0.035, respectively) (Table1).

TABLE 3

Independent variables of death or neurological impairments at 2years corrected age

VariablesDeath or neurological impairmentsOdds ratiop
NoYes
(n=99)(n=63)Mean (95% CI)
Univariate analysis
Period
2006–200711 (45.8)13 (54.2)Reference
2008–201135 (63.6)20 (36.4)0.484 (0.183 – 1.279)0.143
2012–201553 (63.9)30 (36.1)0.479 (0.191 – 1.201)0.117
Antenatal glucocorticoid
No30 (53.6)26 (46.4)Reference
Yes69 (65.1)37 (34.9)0.619 (0.32 – 1.197)0.154
Intravenous ritodrine
No18 (64.3)10 (35.7)Reference
Yes81 (60.4)53 (39.6)1.178 (0.505 – 2.747)0.705
Intravenous magnesium
No39 (62.9)23 (37.1)Reference
Yes60 (60.0)40 (40.0)1.130 (0.589 – 2.171)0.713
Caesarean delivery
No29 (50.9)28 (49.1)Reference
Yes70 (66.7)35 (33.3)0.518 (0.268 – 1.001)0.050
PROM
No64 (58.7)45 (41.3)Reference
Yes35 (66.0)18 (34.0)0.731 (0.369 – 1.450)0.371
Multiple births
No87 (61.7)54 (38.3)Reference
Yes12 (57.1)9 (42.9)1.208 (0.477 – 3.058)0.690
Sex
Female53 (67.9)25 (32.1)Reference
Male46 (54.8)38 (45.2)1.751 (0.923 – 3.324)0.087
Gestational age (week)26.0±1.324.9±1.50.599 (0.473 – 0.758)<0.001
Birth weight (per 100g)8.05±2.127.06±2.170.795 (0.675 – 0.936)0.006
Cord blood pH7.34±0.087.33±0.130.27 (0.011 – 6.524)0.420
Apgar score (1min)4 (4 – 5)4 (4 – 5)0.718 (0.603 – 0.855)<0.001
Apgar score (5min)7 (7 – 7)6 (6 – 8)0.709 (0.594 – 0.847)<0.001
Respiratory distress syndrome requiring surfactant replacement
No7 (100.0)0 (0.0)Not applicablea
Yes92 (59.4)63 (40.6)
Surfactant replacement
≥30min14 (51.9)13 (48.1)Reference
<30min85 (63.0)50 (37.0)0.633 (0.276 – 1.455)0.282
Catheterisation <67min*
No77 (63.1)45 (36.9)Reference
Yes22 (55.0)18 (45.0)1.400 (0.679 – 2.886)0.362
Inotropes on day 0
No42 (79.2)11 (20.8)Reference
Yes57 (52.3)52 (47.7)3.483 (1.624 – 7.469)0.001
Prophylactic gentamycin on day 0
No21 (56.8)16 (43.2)Reference
Yes78 (62.4)47 (37.6)0.791 (0.376 – 1.665)0.537
Prophylactic indomethacin <6h
No50 (57.5)37 (42.5)Reference
Yes49 (65.3)26 (34.7)0.717 (0.379 – 1.357)0.307
Surgical ductus closure
No81 (57.9)59 (42.1)Reference
Yes18 (81.8)4 (18.2)0.305 (0.098 – 0.948)0.040
High humidifier setting of respiratory gases
No9 (45.0)11 (55.0)Reference
Yes90 (63.4)52 (36.6)0.473 (0.184 – 1.216)0.120
NEC or intestinal perforation
No97 (61.8)60 (38.2)Reference
Yes2 (40.0)3 (60.0)2.425 (0.394 – 14.936)0.340
Establishment of enteral feeding 100ml/kg
day 17**85 (73.3)31 (26.7)Reference
≥day 1714 (30.4)32 (69.6)6.267 (2.958 – 13.277)<0.001
Postnatal administration of intravenous glucocorticoid
No32 (69.6)14 (30.4)Reference
Yes67 (57.8)49 (42.2)1.672 (0.807 – 3.462)0.167
Multivariate model
Period 2008–2011 (vs. 2006–2007)0.233 (0.074 – 0.733)0.013
Period 2012–2015 (vs. 2006–2007)0.318 (0.109 – 0.923)0.035
Gestational age (week)0.619 (0.472 – 0.811)0.001
Apgar score (5min)0.759 (0.621 – 0.927)0.007
Male sex2.049 (0.978 – 4.292)0.057

Open in a separate window

Note

Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation, median (quartile range) or incidence (%). Neurological impairments are defined as the Gross Motor Function Classification Score of III–V, deafness or blindness at two years corrected age. Thresholds of 67min and 17days are defined as lower* and upper** quartiles of all values, respectively.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NEC, necrotising enterocolitis; PROM, premature rupture of the membranes.

aLogistic regression analysis not performed due to complete separation of independent variables into a particular outcome status.

3.5. Independent variables of the secondary outcomes

At a corrected age of 40weeks, death (n=19) or survival with intraventricular haemorrhage (n=19) was associated with period 2012–2015 (vs. period 2006–2007; p=0.001), antenatal glucocorticoid (p=0.003), gestational age (p<0.001), birth weight (p=0.002), Apgar scores at 1 and 5min (both p<0.001), surfactant replacement within 30min after birth (p=0.024), requirement for inotropes on day zero (p=0.005), indomethacin administration within 6h after birth (p=0.001), high humidifier setting (p=0.019) and delayed establishment of enteral feeding (p<0.001) (TableS1). In the multivariate model, death or survival with intraventricular haemorrhage was associated with the therapeutic regimen for periods 2008–2011 and 2012–2015, even after adjusting for gestational age, Apgar scores at 5min and sex (vs. period 2006–2007, p=0.009 and p<0.001, respectively) (Table4A).

TABLE 4

Independent variables of secondary outcomes: Multivariate models

A: Grade III/IV intraventricular haemorrhage or death at 40weeks corrected age as a secondary outcome
VariablesDeath or haemorrhageOdds ratiop
NoYes
(n=124)(n=38)Mean (95% CI)
Period
2006–200713 (54.2)11 (45.8)Reference
2008–201139 (70.9)16 (29.1)0.177 (0.049 – 0.647)0.009
2012–201572 (86.7)11 (13.3)0.072 (0.018 – 0.285)<0.001
Gestational age (week)25.9±1.324.3±1.40.499 (0.356 – 0.700)<0.001
Apgar score at 5min of birth7 (7 – 8)6 (6 – 6)0.726 (0.567 – 0.929)0.011
Male sex61 (72.6)23 (27.4)2.281 (0.900 – 5.776)0.082

Open in a separate window

B: Death by two years corrected age as a secondary outcome
VariablesDeathOdds ratiop
NoYes
(n=142)(n=20)Mean (95% CI)
Period
2006–200713 (54.2)11 (45.8)Reference
2008–201148 (87.3)7 (12.7)0.033 (0.006 – 0.185)<0.001
2012–201581 (97.6)2 (2.4)0.005 (0.000 – 0.053)<0.001
Gestational age (week)25.7±1.424.2±1.70.533 (0.332 – 0.854)0.009
Apgar score at 5min of birth7 (7 – 8)6 (6 – 7)0.601 (0.410 – 0.882)0.009
Male sex73 (86.9)11 (13.1)1.937 (0.518 – 7.251)0.326

Open in a separate window

Note

Values are shown as mean ±standard deviation, median (quartile range) or incidence (%).

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Death before a corrected age of 2years was associated with periods 2008–2011 and 2012–2015 (vs. period 2006–2007, p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively), antenatal glucocorticoid (p=0.004), gestational age (p<0.001), birth weight (p=0.008), Apgar scores at 1 and 5min (p=0.005 and p=0.003, respectively), early surfactant replacement (p<0.001), the requirement for inotropes on day zero (p=0.049), high humidifier setting (p<0.001), necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation (p=0.002), use of gentamicin (vs. cefotaxime, p=0.004) and early commencement of parenteral nutrition (p<0.001, Fisher's exact test) (TableS2). In the multivariate model, death was dependent on the therapeutic regimen for periods 2008–2011 and 2012–2015 even after adjusting for gestational age, Apgar scores at 5min and male sex (vs. period 2006–2007, both p<0.001) (Table4B).

4. DISCUSSION

Accumulating clinical evidence in neonatal medicine has contributed to improve therapeutic strategies for preterm infants.21, 22 However, individual centres often find it difficult to adopt new therapeutic regimens, and empiric therapies may remain without being updated because of considerable variations in the patient backgrounds and availability of medical resources at each centre. During the period 2006–2007 of our study, surfactant replacement was performed only after radiographic confirmation of the depth of the endotracheal tube, based on the prior experience in a caesarean‐born infant. Shortly after surfactant replacement, this infant developed right‐sided pneumothorax, whose endotracheal tube was discovered to be within the right main bronchus on the first radiograph. On another occasion, NICU nurses had trouble with excessive condensation within the ventilator circuit, which led to a de‐escalation of the humidifier setting to a lower than the standard level.

We believe that these outdated regimens may have been responsible for some of the adverse events. Considering the clinical staff's anticipation towards introducing dramatic changes to the protocol, the working group decided to promote bottom‐up discussions within the clinical staff regarding the priority, scientific basis and potential risk/benefits of newly introduced therapeutic regimens. Guided by regular appraisals of clinical practice and literature review, two sets of interventions were implemented. These included early stabilisation of infants with immediate surfactant replacement,9 swift vascular catheterisation and early prophylactic indomethacin therapy,12 early administration of narcotics 18 and parenteral nutrition,20 as well as culture adjusted routine antibiotics and standard high humidity of respiratory gases.10 These interventions led to a significant improvement in infant outcomes. Even for the revision of outdated regimes, attempts to change clinical protocols are often met with resistance and obstacles. A bottom‐up approach and transparent process with careful appraisal of the clinical practice may help yield a consensus while maintaining a team solidarity.

The PDCA cycle is a quality improvement tool developed for the manufacturing industry 23 and has been increasingly used in the healthcare sector.7, 8 Unlike other quality improvement tools,24 the PDCA cycle repeatedly requires time‐consuming processes in exchange for its simplicity and nature to provide continuous improvement of the system. Although publications of clinical projects using the PDCA cycle are still limited in Japan, this tool is increasingly used in quality improvement of nursing, and the application of which is now recommended by the Japan Nursing Society.25 In our current project, the quality improvement process using the PDCA cycle was well accepted by the multidisciplinary team, through which physicians, nurses and other members were able to contribute equally to the project. Considering the time required to accumulate cases for the appraisal of clinical practice, the PDCA cycle's time‐consuming nature is unlikely to be a critical disadvantage in quality improvement projects. Therefore, iteration cycles, such as the PDCA cycle, might be one option when revising outdated clinical protocols without major conflict with existing therapeutic regimes.

Our study assessed the relationship between clinical outcomes and the sets of therapeutic regimens represented by the study periods, rather than each specific procedure. However, findings from the univariate analysis highlighted several potential variables associated with infant survival, such as respiratory gas humidity and the choice of antibiotics. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of these variables on the outcome.

There were several limitations to our study. First, although we observed a temporal improvement of the outcome in our study cohort, the number of infants, who developed cerebral palsy and/or neurosensory impairments, appeared to increase with time (Table2). It was possible that a considerable fraction of infants, who survived in relationship with the revision of clinical protocols, developed neurological impairments. Second, this study was not powered to identify specific procedures associated with improved outcomes in infants. Therefore, several procedures enforced during periods 2008–2011 and 2012–2015 may be unrelated to the outcomes. Third, the cohort size was small and heterogeneous among the three observational periods. Finally, the difference in the outcomes observed among the study periods might have been due to temporal improvement of practice and unintended protocol changes, as seen in the increased administration of antenatal glucocorticoid.

5. CONCLUSIONS

The use of PDCA cycle, which consists of review of clinical practice, short term outcome and latest clinical evidence, followed by the protocol revision and reappraisal, was associated with improved long‐term outcomes in extremely preterm infants. Our bottom‐up approach in adopting standard treatments accounting for the local environment may help fill the gap between the standard of care and ongoing clinical practice.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supporting information

Table S1‐S2

Click here for additional data file.(31K, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the nurses from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Kurume University Hospital for their support, and Ms. Chiaki Ueno and Chiho Yoshii for their consistent support and encouragement.

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Grant‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research 17K16314 to M.S.)

REFERENCES

1. Su BH, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from taiwan: comparison with Canada, Japan, and the USA. Pediatr Neonatol. 2015;56(1):46‐52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Yamakawa T, Itabashi K, Kusuda S. Neonatal Research Network of Japan. Mortality and morbidity risks vary with birth weight standard deviation score in growth restricted extremely preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2016;92:7‐11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Kusuda S, Fujimura M, Sakuma I, et al. Morbidity and mortality of infants with very low birth weight in Japan: center variation. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):e1130‐e1138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Japanese Preterm PDA Guideline Group (J‐PreP Guideline Group). Clinical practice guideline for the management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low birth weight infants, 2010. Osaka: Japan Society for Premature and Newborn Medicine; 2010. 508 p. (Japanese).

5. Isayama T, Ye XY, Tokumasu H, et al. The effect of professional‐led guideline workshops on clinical practice for the management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates in Japan: a controlled before‐and‐after study. Implement Sci. 2015;8(10):67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Itabashi K, Horiuchi T, Kusuda S, et al. Mortality rates for extremely low birth weight infants born in Japan in 2005. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):445‐450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Nicolay CR, Purkayastha S, Greenhalgh A, et al. Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare. Br J Surg. 2012;99(3):324‐335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Wang LR, Wang Y, Lou Y, Li Y, Zhang XG. The role of quality control circles in sustained improvement of medical quality. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):141. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Rojas‐Reyes MX, Morley CJ, Soll R. Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(3):CD000510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. ISO–ISO 8185:2007. Respiratory tract humidifiers for medical use — Particular requirements for respiratory humidification systems. [cited 3rd Mar 2021]; Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/38527.html

11. Solomita M, Daroowalla F, Leblanc DS, Smaldone GC. Y‐piece temperature and humidification during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2009;54(4):480‐486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Ment LR, Oh W, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Low‐dose indomethacin and prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage: a multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1994;93(4):543‐550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. de Man P, Verhoeven BA, Verbrugh HA, Vos MC, van den Anker JN. An antibiotic policy to prevent emergence of resistant bacilli. Lancet. 2000;355(9208):973‐978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Bitner‐Glindzicz M, Rahman S. Ototoxicity caused by aminoglycosides. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):784‐785. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Santos RP, Tristram D. A practical guide to the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of neonatal infections. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62(2):491‐508. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Gleason CA, Juul SE. Avery's Dideases of the Newborn (10th edn). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017;561‐563. [Google Scholar]

17. McWilliam SJ, Antoine DJ, Smyth RL, Pirmohamed M. Aminoglycoside‐induced nephrotoxicity in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32(11):2015‐2025. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Simons SH, van Dijk M, van Lingen RA, et al. Routine morphine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventilatory support: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(18):2419‐2427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Romantsik O, Bruschettini M, Calevo MG, Banzi R, Ley D. Pharmacological pain and sedation interventions for the prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants on assisted ventilation ‐ an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(6):CD012706. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Moyses HE, Johnson MJ, Leaf AA, Cornelius VR. Early parenteral nutrition and growth outcomes in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(4):816‐826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Lee SK. Implementing evidence‐based practices improves neonatal outcomes. Evid Based Med. 2016;21(6):231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Zeitlin J, Manktelow BN, Piedvache A, et al. Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort. BMJ. 2016;i2976. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Realyvásquez‐Vargas A, Arredondo‐Soto K, Carrillo‐Gutiérrez T, Ravelo G. Applying the Plan‐Do‐Check‐Act (PDCA) Cycle to reduce the defects in the anufacturing industry. A case study. Appl Sci. 2018;8(11):2181. [Google Scholar]

24. Lebeda FJ, Scheerer JB, Dembek ZF. A systems perspective of DoD global health engagement. Mil Med. 2020;185(7–8):e1024‐e1031. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. The official website of the Japan Nursing Society. [cited 3rd Mar 2021]; Available from: https://www.nurse.or.jp/jna/english/

Articles from Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

Revisions of clinical protocols using the Plan Do Check Act cycle improved outcomes of extremely preterm infants at 2 years (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Last Updated:

Views: 6463

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Birthday: 1999-09-15

Address: 8416 Beatty Center, Derekfort, VA 72092-0500

Phone: +6838967160603

Job: Mining Executive

Hobby: Woodworking, Knitting, Fishing, Coffee roasting, Kayaking, Horseback riding, Kite flying

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Refugio Daniel, I am a fine, precious, encouraging, calm, glamorous, vivacious, friendly person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.